Weblog

Monday, 30 August 2010

  • the city of women, the city of mirth


           When Romulus looked down at his city, he discovered what every man after him will also come to recognize— namely, that cities are defined by women.  Women walk their streets, women make rounds in their marketplaces, women stand on their rooftops and at open windows, their voices filling the air.  From atop the Palatine Hill, this is how Rome must have appeared in the beginning, the kidnapped Sabine women traversing its alleys and passageways like luckless victims in a labyrinth.  In fact, if we are to regress and break down the word city itself, we will find that even it is feminine.  City, from the Latin civitas and ultimately, urbs, takes on the female gender grammatically in many languages: la ciudad in Spanish, die stadt in German, la ville in French, la città in Italian, and so on.
           So, women are cities, and cities are women.  I want to imagine that a city such as this is a slow city.  Once its avenues are drawn and laid and every square mile is populated, its citizens go about their lives in such an impeded state that to an outsider, it is immobile.  Cars slide on the asphalt, birds never land, strangers lock eyes for years, rain is in suspension, earthquakes do not seem to affect it.  Placed side by side, a normal city would appear to experience accelerated progress.  I want to call this type of city a city of mirth.  Mirth: jollity, gaiety, laughter.  Its inhabitants are young and then are old, they habitually find the shortest ways to the end of a conversation, buses and trains arrive at their destinations instantaneously, buildings are built and then razed immediately, etc.  The excited city left to its own accord would, like any other city of its kind, simply be founded, thrive, and die.
           To prevent this destruction, we must put these two entities together, the city of women and the city of mirth.  It is only by doing so that we can explain the continued existence of the cities of old: Byblos, Damascus, Jericho, Beirut and so on.  According to Calvino, cities such as these have struggled to finally arrive at their current shapes.  So then it is only natural that I want to imagine a city without a permanent form at all.  For example, its streets are arbitrarily placed, its residents speak in tongues not yet evolved, law and lawlessness coexist peacefully.  This polymorphous city takes on the shapes of its daily whims: a carousel, a puddle, an animal, a desert plant, and so on, a veritable constellation indecisive in both anatomy and arrangement.  From an outsider’s perspective, this is how this new city will always appear.  From the inside however, one only has to imagine the first days of the Roman empire through the eyes of one of its denizens.  If we were present in the moment, if we could place ourselves where we could never be, we would see Romulus above on his hill and the city of women below him, a city of aqueducts, bridges, outdoor theaters, markets with sundries and myrrh, baths, libraries, and roads repeating themselves in intricate gossamer patterns.  La mujer, die frau, la femme, la donna, and so on.  This would be the city of memory.


     

    - Chicago (Dan Schultz)


Saturday, 07 August 2010

  • "I should seek to make young people vividly aware of the past, vividly realizing that the future of man will in all likelihood be immeasurably longer than his past, profoundly conscious of the minuteness of the planet upon which we live and of the fact that life on this planet is only a temporary incident; and at the same time with these facts which tend to emphasize the insignificance of the individual, I should present quite another set of facts designed to impress upon the mind of the young the greatness of which the individual is capable, and the knowledge that throughout all the depths of stellar space nothing of equal value is known to us.

    And he will see that the man whose mind mirrors the world becomes in a sense as great as the world.  In emancipation from the fears that beset the salve of circumstance he will experience a profound joy, and through all the vicissitudes of his outward life he will remain in the depths of his being a happy man."

     


     

     

                         

     

     

     

                

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    From wiki:

    "Project Excelsior was a series of high-altitude parachute jumps made by Colonel (then Captain) Joseph Kittinger of the United States Air Force in 1959 and 1960 to test the Beaupre multi-stage parachute system. In one of these jumps Kittinger set world records for the highest parachute jump, the longest parachute drogue fall, and the fastest speed by a human through the atmosphere, all of which still stand."

     


                                       

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    - The Conquest of Happiness, Bertrand Russell; Philippe Petit;

    Untitled [Falling Buffalo], 1988-89, David Wojnarowicz; Eadward Muybridge; Project Excelsior

     

Wednesday, 28 July 2010

  • memoranda neue

           In third person: A woman sits recollecting her lovers.  Hours after beginning, she finds that there have been more than she remembers.  She begins writing down their names on sheets of paper, on her hands and arms, in the margins of old magazines.  Soon, she resorts to the blank walls of her room, filling them each to their corners.  The ones remaining she begins reciting their names aloud, recalling their middle names and surnames whenever possible.  She consults the pages of The Decameron for those she has long forgotten; she consults telephone directories for those yet to come.  A lover is not determined only by past and current coital interactions, as is defined by normal usage.  Instead, to her, a lover is also every man with whom she will eventually come into contact throughout the rest of her life, physically, verbally, mentally, situationally, every man that she has not yet met, but has already assigned idiosyncrasies to and to whom she has committed names.  Engaged in this process of selective remembrance, she arrives at a new discovery: that she is living in the time of new memories.
           In second person: You meet a man who says he is able to will things and events solely by the use of repetition.  Under these rules, he explains to you, things happen as they should and things happen as they should not.  Macduff kills Macbeth, the smile of Persephone brings about the changes in the seasons, weight is a function of gravity, elephants fly, turkeys swim, fish crawl, and so on.  As an exercise, he tells you to think about mythical creatures, repeating them in your mind until they populate your every thought: sphinxes, sphinxes, sphinxes, hippogriffs, hippogriffs, satyrs, satyrs, centaurs, centaurs.  If you repeat an argument enough times, it becomes true.  For instance, Borges’ dreamtiger.  Dreamtigers exist along the Paraná River, inhabiting the dense foliage along the banks.  Their stripes are inverted, those dreamtigers.
           And finally, in first person: I am always forced to recall things as they were.  Remember the tigers: if you repeat an argument enough times, it becomes true.  In other words, hypotheses of the present will eventually turn into laws of the past.  In the time of new memories, a promiscuous woman dreams up future lovers in her bedroom, repeating their names with her inner voice, ingraining each into her mind.  Effectively, she has already spoken to each of them.  Effectively, she has already led each of them by the hand to her bed.  If I apply the same rules to logic, similarities appear.  Logic exposed under the fallacy of repetition begins to break down because logic does not exist if it is under duress.  What I mean to say is if an argument, action, or thought perseverates enough, we can begin to ascribe to it certain truths, or in the case of a mythical creature, even go so far as to analyze its behavioral patterns and circadian rhythm.


Thursday, 20 May 2010

  • Americana


          Kundera says that homo sentimentalis is not only a man with feelings, but one who has elevated feeling to something with tangible, even clerical value.  Therefore, as another person of society who prides himself on his values, man must feel.  However, he also states that as soon as man is cognizant of this ability and decision to feel, that this man is no longer feeling, but in hysteria.  He calls this second group homo hystericus. 
          I would like to propose a third species, homo melancholis.  Members of homo melancholis feel sentimentally and hysterically, but also melancholically.  Therefore, the world passes this man by.  People walk by sadly, buses drive themselves sadly, scaffolds are raised sadly, buildings are built sadly.  But the mistake should not be made: this man is not dispirited.  Hardly, because in fact, of the three, homo melancholis retains the most accurate value judgments.  To this man, things have always existed within preset guidelines and limits.  In other words, things appear premeditated.  Cartographically speaking, the nameless city in which he lives is entirely calculated.  Streets only run perpendicular and parallel, people walk along predetermined routes, buses run according to schedule, and so forth.  Following this extremely rational framework, homo melancholis will find himself repeating his actions because they are sensible, because they are logical.  He awakens every morning at the same time, he visits the same coffee shop, orders the same item, thinks about the same woman, over and over again. 
          Within these parameters, homo melancholis finds that things are backwardly attracted.  He befriends futurists who tend to theorize about the past, he finds that Hamlet must turn his sword on the king to attain peace, he watches men and women make eyes only to repel each other upon speaking.  He finds these reverse affinities everywhere.  In fact, he is not dissimilar from homo sentimentalis or hystericus.  What I mean: Sentimentalis looks at a cathedral.  To him, even a single brick of the façade has emotional value.  Looking at this one brick, he can feel it play its role as a part of a grand whole.  He becomes paralyzed by sentiment.  Hystericus looks at the brick.  He notices that it is loose.  He watches it shift position in the high winds above, but does nothing.  He is paralyzed with hysteria of its eventual fall.  Day after day, he stands across the street and watches as it loosens slowly.  Melancholis sees the brick falling, but he is unconcerned with the vector of its descent or the speed at which it plummets.  Instead, he is preoccupied with visions of the city as it once was.  He sees the falling brick as a premeditation of a continuous narrative.  He is then able to draw only one of two conclusions, that the falling brick was meant to either purposely rob someone of immortality or purposely make a depression in the sidewalk.

Saturday, 27 March 2010

  • It was that memorable evening in March out at the end of the jetty.  She was lying there in a white cotton dress and I mistook her for a rowboat.



     





                             




    - David Ives, Jim Dine



fictionisms

  • Visit fictionisms's Xanga Site
    • Name: Vince
    • Member Since: 11/22/2002

Archives

Don't worry - your calendar is here… to see it in action just click "Save" above and refresh the page.